Special Section on Mask Technology for Optical Lithography

Photomask dimensional metrology in the scanning electron microscope, part I: Has anything really changed?

[+] Author Affiliations
Michael T. Postek, Andra´s E. Vlada´r

National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899

Marylyn Hoy Bennett

International SEMATECH and Texas Instruments Austin, Texas 78741

J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 3(2), 212-223 (Apr 01, 2004). doi:10.1117/1.1668271
History: Received Apr. 16, 2003; Revised Aug. 12, 2003; Accepted Sep. 9, 2003; Online March 31, 2004
Text Size: A A A

Photomask dimensional metrology in the scanning electron microscope has not evolved as rapidly as the metrology of resists and integrated circuit features on wafers. This has been due partly to the 4× (or 5×) reduction in optical steppers and scanners used in the lithography process, and partly for the lesser need to account for the real three dimensionality of the mask structures. So, where photomasks are concerned, many of the issues challenging wafer dimensional metrology at 1× are reduced by a factor of 4 or 5 and thus could be temporarily swept aside. This is rapidly changing with the introduction of advanced masks with optical proximity correction and phase shifting features used in 100 nm and smaller circuit generations. Fortunately, photomask metrology generally benefits from the advances made for wafer metrology, but there are still unique issues to be solved in this form of dimensional metrology. It is likely that no single metrology method or tool will ever provide all necessary answers. As with other types of metrology, resolution, sensitivity and linearity in three-dimensional measurements of the shape of the lines and phase shifting features in general (width, height and wall angles) and departure from the desired shape (surface and edge roughness, etc.) are the key parameters. Different methods and tools differ in their capability to collect average and localized signals at acceptable speed, but in any case, application of thorough knowledge of the physics of the given metrology is essential to extract the information needed. This paper will discuss the precision, accuracy and traceability in SEM metrology of photomasks. Current and possible new techniques utilized in the measurements of photomasks including suppression of charge and highly accurate modeling for electron beam metrology will also be explored to answer the question, Has anything really changed? © 2004 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

© 2004 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers

Citation

Michael T. Postek ; Andra´s E. Vlada´r and Marylyn Hoy Bennett
"Photomask dimensional metrology in the scanning electron microscope, part I: Has anything really changed?", J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 3(2), 212-223 (Apr 01, 2004). ; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1668271


Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.