Special Section on Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability

True process variation aware optical proximity correction with variational lithography modeling and model calibration

[+] Author Affiliations
Peng Yu

The University of Texas, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Austin, Texas 78712

Sean X. Shi

The University of Texas, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Austin, Texas 78712

David Z. Pan

The University of Texas, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Austin, Texas 78712

J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 6(3), 031004 (September 11, 2007). doi:10.1117/1.2752814
History: Received November 02, 2006; Revised February 22, 2007; Accepted March 01, 2007; Published September 11, 2007
Text Size: A A A

Optical proximity correction (OPC) is one of the most widely used resolution enhancement techniques (RET) in nanometer designs to improve subwavelength printability. Conventional model-based OPC assumes nominal process conditions without considering process variations because of the lack of variational lithography models. A simple method to improve OPC results under process variations is to sample multiple process conditions across the process window, which requires long run times. We derive a variational lithography model (VLIM) that can simulate across the process window without much run-time overhead compared to the conventional lithography models. To match the model to experimental data, we demonstrate a VLIM calibration method. The calibrated model has accuracy comparable to nonvariational models, but has the advantage of taking process variations into consideration. We introduce the variational edge placement error (VEPE) metrics based on the model, a natural extension to the edge placement error (EPE) used in conventional OPC algorithms. A true process-variation aware OPC (PVOPC) framework is proposed used the VEPE metric. Due to the analytical nature of VLIM, our PVOPC is only about 2 to 3× slower than the conventional OPC, but it explicitly considers the two main sources of process variations (exposure dose and focus variations) during OPC. Thus our post-PVOPC results are much more robust than the conventional OPC ones, in terms of both geometric printability and electrical characterization under process variations.

© 2007 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers

Citation

Peng Yu ; Sean X. Shi and David Z. Pan
"True process variation aware optical proximity correction with variational lithography modeling and model calibration", J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 6(3), 031004 (September 11, 2007). ; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2752814


Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.