Special Section on Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability

Direct optimization approach for lithographic process conditions

[+] Author Affiliations
Tim Fühner

Fraunhofer Institute of Integrated Systems and Device Technology (IISB), Schottkystrasse 10, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Andreas Erdmann

Fraunhofer Institute of Integrated Systems and Device Technology (IISB), Schottkystrasse 10, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Sebastian Seifert

University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Computer Science Department 2, Martensstrasse 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 6(3), 031006 (September 27, 2007). doi:10.1117/1.2785031
History: Received November 08, 2006; Revised August 08, 2007; Accepted August 24, 2007; Published September 27, 2007
Text Size: A A A

We present a semiautomatic procedure for the optimization of lithographic process conditions. In the regime of resolution enhancement techniques such as optical proximity correction, off-axis illumination, and phase shifting masks, the design of lithographic photomasks and illumination sources becomes increasingly intricate. Earlier “what you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) approaches cannot be applied anymore. Instead, the employment of sophisticated design optimization tools is inevitable. In contrast to related efforts using an inverse problem formulation to address this goal, the approach presented here can be considered a direct method: mask and illumination layouts are mutually altered, evaluated, and improved, using an heuristic search algorithm. Thus, not only does this method require very little a priori knowledge of the process, it also allows for a very flexible problem formulation, enabling an easy integration of different model options or even process steps. As an underlying optimization algorithm of the presented procedure, a genetic algorithm has been used, whose flow, data representation, and basic operations are discussed briefly. Different representation types for both mask and illumination setups and the formulation of the optimization objectives are explained in detail. Various well-performing mask and illumination settings demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach and point out further potentials: in contrast to single problem specific approaches, this method is applicable to a great variety of different complex optimization tasks in advanced lithography.

© 2007 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers

Citation

Tim Fühner ; Andreas Erdmann and Sebastian Seifert
"Direct optimization approach for lithographic process conditions", J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 6(3), 031006 (September 27, 2007). ; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2785031


Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.