Paper
5 July 2000 Forbidden pitches for 130-nm lithography and below
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Experiments and simulations were done to determine which pitches are forbidden for 130nm and 110nm features. Off axis illumination, annular and Quasar, and different reticle types, binary mask (BIM), 6 percent attenuating phase shift mask (PSM), 18 percent attenuating PSM, and alternating PSM were simulated and were exposed on an ASML PAS5500/700. Except for the 1:1 line to space ratio, Quasar for the BIM and the attenuated PSM had the largest process window without forbidden pitches. By increasing the transmission the exposure latitude increases. Increasing transmission, however, does not improve the depth of focus (DOF). Annular illumination was ineffective in increasing the DOF beyond 0.5micrometers for both the 130nm and 110nm features. The alternating PSM with low sigma had no forbidden pitches and had the largest DOF. Alternating PSM with high sigma however, was unable to resolve the dense pitches with sufficient process window.
© (2000) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Robert John Socha, Mircea V. Dusa, Luigi Capodieci, Jo Finders, J. Fung Chen, Donis G. Flagello, and Kevin D. Cummings "Forbidden pitches for 130-nm lithography and below", Proc. SPIE 4000, Optical Microlithography XIII, (5 July 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.388951
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 27 scholarly publications and 1 patent.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Optical proximity correction

Reticles

Photomasks

Data modeling

Binary data

Lithography

Phase shifts

Back to Top