Paper
20 October 2006 Finding the needle in the haystack: using full-chip process window analysis to qualify competing SRAF placement strategies for 65 nm
Mark Mason, Shane Best, Gary Zhang, Mark Terry, Robert Soper
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
It is widely understood that the IC Industry's adherence to Moore's Law is widening the gap between the wavelength of light used in semiconductor manufacturing and the features that they define. Increasingly, the patterning community has turned to higher complexity imaging solutions to fill the gap. This steadily increasing complexity is placing a new burden on lithographers and resolution enhancement technology engineers to guarantee that the highly complex patterning strategies will work for all patterns. Traditionally, lithography strategies have been characterized using relatively simple one-dimensional "litho test patterns." Real circuits are highly randomized however, and complex two-dimensional interactions are the rule rather than the exception. This paper extends the paradigm for use of newly available post-OPC verification (POV) technology to the realm of RET development. We offer a case study where two competing 65-nm logic node sub-resolution assist feature (SRAF) strategies for poly layer patterning are evaluated on a full chip using commercially available post-OPC verification technology. We are able to evaluate differences in CD control process window, SRAF printability (illustrated in Figure 1), MEEF sensitivity, and catastrophic defect propensity. In several critical cases, we show silicon confirmation of the simulated results. This methodology allows leveraging of existing full-chip POV technology to enable the selection of the best SRAF strategy with minimal use of costly split lot silicon.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Mark Mason, Shane Best, Gary Zhang, Mark Terry, and Robert Soper "Finding the needle in the haystack: using full-chip process window analysis to qualify competing SRAF placement strategies for 65 nm", Proc. SPIE 6349, Photomask Technology 2006, 63491X (20 October 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.687008
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
SRAF

Optical proximity correction

Resolution enhancement technologies

Optical lithography

Model-based design

Silicon

Lithography

RELATED CONTENT

Model-based HSF using by target point control function
Proceedings of SPIE (March 18 2015)
A study of ILT based curvilinear SRAF with a constant...
Proceedings of SPIE (December 01 2022)
Image fidelity verification: contourIFV
Proceedings of SPIE (May 03 2004)
Pre-OPC layout decomposition for improved image fidelity
Proceedings of SPIE (March 16 2009)
Programmable RET mask layout verification
Proceedings of SPIE (December 27 2002)
The rising cost and complexity of RETs
Proceedings of SPIE (May 03 2004)

Back to Top