Paper
23 March 2009 Sensitivity of SEM width measurements to model assumptions
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The most accurate width measurements in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) require raw images to be corrected for instrumental artifacts. Corrections are based upon a physical model that describes the sample-instrument interaction. Models differ in their approaches or approximations in the treatment of scattering cross sections, secondary electron (SE) generation, material properties, scattering at the surface potential barrier, etc. Corrections that use different models produce different width estimates. We have implemented eight models in the JMONSEL SEM simulator. Two are phenomenological models based upon fitting measured yield vs. energy curves. Two are based upon a binary scattering model. Four are variants of a dielectric function approach. These models are compared to each other in pairwise simulations in which the output of one model is fit to the other by using adjustable parameters similar to those used to fit measured data. The differences in their edge position parameters is then a measure of how much these models differ with respect to a width measurement. With electron landing energy, beam width, and other parameters typical of those used in industrial critical dimension measurements, the models agreed to within ±2.0 nm on silicon and ±2.6 nm on copper in 95% of comparisons.
© (2009) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
J. S. Villarrubia and Z. J. Ding "Sensitivity of SEM width measurements to model assumptions", Proc. SPIE 7272, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIII, 72720R (23 March 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.814300
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 17 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Scattering

Monte Carlo methods

Scanning electron microscopy

Silicon

Copper

Data modeling

Binary data

Back to Top