Paper
18 March 2015 Mask 3D induced phase and the mitigation by absorber optimization
Jo Finders, Jean Galvier
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
In this paper we extend our work into the impact of Mask Topography induced effects in current state of the art lithography by looking at the phase in the diffracted orders. By analyzing and describing the phase in a similar and systematic way as done for projection lenses, we could identify already known effects as best focus differences and pattern asymmetry, but also a new significant effect was found: contrast loss. We used the phase range in the diffracted orders as a metric to be used during lithography set-up. We were able to link the performance of different mask absorber types and parameters with the phase range in the diffracted orders.
© (2015) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Jo Finders and Jean Galvier "Mask 3D induced phase and the mitigation by absorber optimization", Proc. SPIE 9426, Optical Microlithography XXVIII, 942605 (18 March 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2178288
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 5 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

Lithography

Semiconducting wafers

Neodymium

Scattering

Binary data

Reticles

RELATED CONTENT

Patterning 80 nm gates using 248 nm lithography an...
Proceedings of SPIE (September 14 2001)
Mask error factor impact on the 130-nm node
Proceedings of SPIE (July 05 2000)
Measuring and modeling flare in optical lithography
Proceedings of SPIE (June 26 2003)
Full field imaging with a 157-nm scanner
Proceedings of SPIE (May 28 2004)

Back to Top