Study of SRAF placement for contact at 45 nm and 32 nm node

V. Farys; F. Robert; C. Martinelli; Y. Trouiller; F. Sundermann; C. Gardin; J. Planchot; G. Kerrien; F. Vautrin; M. Saied; E. Yesilada; F. Foussadier; A. Villaret; L. Perraud; B. Vandewalle; J. C. Le Denmat; M. K. Top

doi:10.1117/12.774091

12 March 2008 Study of SRAF placement for contact at 45 nm and 32 nm node

V. Farys, F. Robert, C. Martinelli, Y. Trouiller, F. Sundermann, C. Gardin, J. Planchot, G. Kerrien, F. Vautrin, M. Saied, E. Yesilada, F. Foussadier, A. Villaret, L. Perraud, B. Vandewalle, J. C. Le Denmat, M. K. Top

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 6924, Optical Microlithography XXI; 69242Z (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.774091
Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography, 2008, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

At 45 and 32 nm nodes, one of the most critical layers is the Contact one. Due to the use of hyper NA imaging, the depth of focus starts to be very limited. Moreover the OPC is rapidly limited because of the increase of the pattern density. The limited surface in the dark field region of a Contact layer mask enforces the edges movement to stop very quickly. The use of SRAF (Sub Resolution Assist Feature) has been widely use for DOF enhancement of line and space layers since many technology node. Recently, SRAF generated using inverse lithography have shown interesting DOF improvement1. However, the advantage of the ideal mask generated by inverse lithography is lost when switching to a manufacturable mask with Manhattan structures. For SRAF placed in rule based as well as Manhattan SRAF generated after inverse lithography, it is important to know what their behavior is, in term of size and placement. In this article we propose to study the placement of scatter-trenches assist features for the contact layer. For this we have performed process window simulation with different SRAF sizes and distance to the main OPC. These results permit us to establish the trends for size and placement of the SRAF. Moreover we have also take a look of the advantages of using 8 surrounding SRAF (4 in vertical - horizontal and 4 at 45°) versus 4 surrounding SRAF. Based on these studies we have seen that there is no real gain of increasing the complexity by adding additional SRAF.

Citation Download Citation

V. Farys, F. Robert, C. Martinelli, Y. Trouiller, F. Sundermann, C. Gardin, J. Planchot, G. Kerrien, F. Vautrin, M. Saied, E. Yesilada, F. Foussadier, A. Villaret, L. Perraud, B. Vandewalle, J. C. Le Denmat, and M. K. Top "Study of SRAF placement for contact at 45 nm and 32 nm node", Proc. SPIE 6924, Optical Microlithography XXI, 69242Z (12 March 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.774091

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available