Applications and benefits of "perfectly bad" optical surfaces

Paul R. Dumas; Robert W. Hallock; Alex Pisarski

doi:10.1117/12.797718

25 September 2008 Applications and benefits of "perfectly bad" optical surfaces

Paul R. Dumas, Robert W. Hallock, Alex Pisarski

Proceedings Volume 7102, Optical Fabrication, Testing, and Metrology III; 71020G (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.797718
Event: Optical Systems Design, 2008, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Abstract

The design and manufacture of most optical systems revolves around the use of ideal optical surfaces. "Perfect" spheres or flats are optimally combined and toleranced during the design phase, and the manufacturers attempt to get as close as possible to these perfect optical surfaces during fabrication. One reason for this stems from the inherent capabilities of the industry's oldest and most pervasive polishing tool: the full-aperture lap. The shape and motion of these tools naturally produce spherical or flat geometries. More recently, a number of new manufacturing technologies based on sub-aperture polishing tools have become available. Sub-aperture tools enable local, preferential removal: a controlled way to polish more material at some locations and less at others. Magnetorheological Finishing (MRF^(R) ) is one such sup-aperture polishing technology, and when combined with an accurate measurement, can offer a precise method for converging to the perfect surface: local removal based directly on measured surface height. This capability, however, can also be leveraged in other, more creative, ways. For example, by replacing the typical surface-error measurement by a transmitted wavefront measurement of an entire low-field optical system, a hitmap can be created for one surface in the system that will perfectly compensate for errors of all the other surfaces. This paper will explore a number of examples where "perfectly bad" surfaces have been exploited in actual optical systems to improve performance, improve manufacturability, or reduce cost. In addition, we will ask the question: if making a "perfectly bad" surface was as easy as making a perfectly good one, would this capability be used more widely by the precision optics industry?

Citation Download Citation

Paul R. Dumas, Robert W. Hallock, and Alex Pisarski "Applications and benefits of "perfectly bad" optical surfaces", Proc. SPIE 7102, Optical Fabrication, Testing, and Metrology III, 71020G (25 September 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.797718

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available