Comparison of satellite-based estimates of aboveground biomass in coppice oak forests using parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric modeling methods

Amir Safari; Hormoz Sohrabi; Scott L. Powell

doi:10.1117/1.JRS.12.046026

11 December 2018 Comparison of satellite-based estimates of aboveground biomass in coppice oak forests using parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric modeling methods

Amir Safari, Hormoz Sohrabi, Scott L. Powell

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 046026 (December 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.046026

Abstract

Accurate estimates of forest biomass are essential for several purposes, ranging from carbon accounting and ecological applications to sustainable forest management. There are, however, critical steps for mapping aboveground forest biomass (AGB) based on optical satellite data with an acceptable degree of accuracy, such as selecting the proper statistical modeling method and deriving spectral information from imagery, at known field locations. We compare nine modeling techniques including parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric methods for remotely estimating AGB based on various spectral variables derived from Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI). We conduct this research in Zagros oak forests on two sites under different human disturbance levels: an undegraded (UD) forest site and a highly degraded (HD) forest site. Based on cross-validation statistics, the UD site exhibited better results than the HD site. Support vector machine (SVM) and Cubist regression (CR) were more precise in terms of coefficient of determination (R²), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), though these approaches also result in more biased estimates compared to the other methods. Our findings reveal that if the degree of under- or over-estimation is not problematic, then SVM and CR are good modeling options (R² = 0.73; RMSE = 31.5 % of the mean, and MAE = 3.93 ton / ha), otherwise, the other modeling methods such as linear model, k-nearest neighbor, boosted regression trees, generalized additive model, and random forest may be better choices. Overall, our work indicates that the use of freely available Landsat 8 OLI and proper statistical modeling methods is a time- and cost-effective approach for accurate AGB estimates in Zagros oak forests.

Citation Download Citation

Amir Safari, Hormoz Sohrabi, and Scott L. Powell "Comparison of satellite-based estimates of aboveground biomass in coppice oak forests using parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric modeling methods," Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 12(4), 046026 (11 December 2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.046026

Received: 12 June 2018; Accepted: 13 November 2018; Published: 11 December 2018

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available