Open Access
30 September 2022 Special Section Guest Editorial: Imaging Neuroimmune, Neuroglial, and Neurovascular Interfaces
Andy Y. Shih, Vanessa Coelho-Santos, Kivilcim Kiliç
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The guest editorial provides an introduction to Parts 1 and 2 of the Neurophotonics Special Section on Imaging Neuroimmune, Neuroglial, and Neurovascular Interfaces.

In this Special Section of Neurophotonics, we focus on optical imaging techniques and their application to studies of neuroimmune, neuroglial, and neurovascular interfaces. Lacking its own energy reserve, the brain’s metabolic demands rely heavily upon a constant supply of blood. A dense network of microscopic blood vessels (arterioles, capillaries, and venules) ensures proper delivery of blood to the brain. However, the vasculature is not just static plumbing. It is highly reactive to surrounding neurons and its response can shape brain activity. In particular, the microvasculature can respond to vasoactive signals released by neighboring neurons and astroglia, and promote blood flow during periods of increased metabolic demand (i.e., neurovascular coupling).1 Many additional vascular functions are also crucial to brain health including regulation of molecular transport into and out of the brain via the blood-brain barrier,2 clearance of brain waste along cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled perivascular routes,3,4 and regulation of immune cell entry into the brain.5 Our understanding of these vital functions has been accelerated by optical imaging techniques that facilitate both in vivo and ex vivo studies of the neurovasculature. The articles published here cover diverse topics and highlight a variety of innovative techniques and concepts from preclinical to clinical applications. They also showcase the exciting work being performed by young scientists that will usher in a new era of discovery.

The brain is composed of many functional regions with distinct circuitries. It is not surprising that the blood vessels serving these distinct tissues also differ in structure, cellular composition, cellular morphology, and genetic profiles.6,7 In addition to defining principles of blood supply to the brain, cross-regional comparisons will clarify why some brain areas are more vulnerable to pathology or why they generate different signals during fMRI. However, the scale of these cross-regional studies needs to be increased. Large-scale mapping of brain vasculature in fixed tissues is becoming more routine with simpler tissue clearing techniques and availability of light-sheet microscopy. Bennett and Kim discuss the various modalities to image whole brain vasculature, and weigh strengths and weaknesses of these approaches.8 They further discuss strategies to label different neurovascular cell types, which is crucial to understanding diversity in the neurovascular unit – the collection of cell types that comprise the blood vessel wall in different blood vessel types. In these endeavors, approaches are needed to label vascular cell types specifically and brightly.8 Frietas-Andrade et al. present an optimized approach to label the endothelium in fixed tissues and introduce software for analysis of vascular structure.9

When considering aging and age-related diseases, the cerebral white matter and deeper brain regions appear to be more vulnerable than cortex and the basis for this vulnerability has remained poorly understood.10,11 In vivo optical imaging has historically been limited to more superficial aspects of the cortex. Recently, three-photon imaging has become the tool of choice to image deeper into brain tissues at cellular resolution, allowing access to cerebral white matter, hippocampus and other subcortical structures without the need to remove overlying tissue.12,13 Thornton et al. describe how three-photon microscopy can be used for multi-color fluorescence imaging of white matter in mice using red fluorophores to image oligodendrocytes and neurons.14 This approach will be important for understanding the vascular basis of myelin degeneration in models of vascular cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease.

While whole brain imaging is possible for fixed specimens, in vivo imaging remains more restrictive with small fields of view. There is a need to understand how behaviors of individual small arterioles and capillaries are coordinated to regulate blood flow broadly across vascular networks. To address this challenge, some imaging techniques strike a balance between imaging resolution, field of view, and acquisition speed. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) resolves microvascular structure and flow more broadly than multiphoton microscopy. Li and Tang describe the principles of OCTA and how to overcome challenges of tailing artifacts caused by blood vessels that limit 3D imaging capacity.15 Tournissac et al. describe a bihemispheric cranial window surgery to improve optical access for longitudinal imaging of brain vasculature in vivo at multiple scales and across brain hemispheres.16 Imaging broad fields of view is also critical to clinical applications. Miller et al. show how laser speckle contrast imaging can provide vascular flow information across a surgical field to guide neurosurgical procedures.17

How neurons communicate with blood vessels during neurovascular coupling is a topic of great interest and debate. Several signaling pathways may be involved. Astrocytes serve as an intermediary to convey signals from neurons to arterioles by enwrapping both synapses and the vascular wall.18 Cam H. Tran synthesizes current knowledge on astrocyte roles in neurovascular coupling and new imaging approaches.19 Gorza et al. provide a comprehensive review of opportunities and challenges to imaging subcellular astrocyte calcium activity using multiphoton microscopy.20 Recent work also suggests that neurons and astroglia provide signals to capillaries, which then rapidly conduct signals upstream to arterioles leading to vasodilation.21 Jeffrey et al. describe an isolated preparation with parenchymal arteriole and attached capillary networks ideal to probe the underpinnings of capillary-to-arteriole conductive signaling.22 Some experiments may require ex vivo brain slices approaches for rigorous pharmacology, and Bojovic et al. describe the use of acute brain slices as a model in neurovascular research.23 Studies are also increasingly in need of fast imaging of calcium and voltage sensitive dyes across tissue volumes; Har-Gil et al. provide new tools to address this need.24 This collection of approaches provides a strong platform for mechanistic studies.

Beyond neurons and astrocytes, other cells of the neurovascular unit are also being actively investigated. Vast capillary networks lie beyond the arterioles and blood flow regulation within capillaries is still not well understood. Recent studies have shown that capillary pericytes serve a role in local blood flow regulation but may contribute to slower aspects of this regulation.25 This may be due to distinctions in the contractile machinery of pericytes, compared to more dynamic tone changes controlled by smooth muscle cells. Erdener et al. provide a deep dive into the cytoskeletal elements that may control pericyte contraction.26 Occupying a perivascular niche next door to smooth muscle and pericytes of the arteriole-capillary transition zone, perivascular fibroblasts have recently come into the spotlight as potential regulators of vascular structure and function.27,28 They may regulate the structure of the vascular basement membrane, an acellular layer of matrix proteins in the vascular wall, or communicate with smooth muscle cells or pericytes. However, their physiological roles remain largely unknown. Jones et al. demonstrate how fibroblast localization can be mapped in cleared brains of fluorescent transgenic mice.29 Vascular cell types also communicate through release of extracellular vesicles, which carry signaling molecules and microRNAs with broad effects on brain function. Bağcı et al. describe approaches to define the molecular heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles.30

In vivo imagers are acutely aware of the observer effect, as one can easily disrupt the delicate physiological processes they intend to study. It is therefore paramount to use approaches that minimize the disruption of the brain and physiological state of the animal. Anesthetics commonly used during in vivo imaging shift our observations away from normal physiology. Zhang et al. provide a detailed guide on best practices to image and measure neurovascular responses in awake mice.31 Studying vascular development in vivo is also challenging because it is a highly orchestrated process32 easily derailed by neuroinflammation associated with skull removal during cranial window generation. Coelho-Santos et al. demonstrate how to minimize perturbations by creating thinned-skull windows in mouse pups for longitudinal imaging.33 Similarly, flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular routes during clearance of brain waste is a delicate process that can be disrupted by invasive cranial window implantation. Kiel et al. demonstrate how infrared imaging of CSF tracers can be used to track CSF tracer flux broadly in the brain through an intact skull.34

Immune cells within the blood, CSF, and marrow of the skull, can interact with and affect cerebrovascular function. This interplay becomes particularly important during brain disease, as recruited immune cells can release vasoactive substances, penetrate the brain tissue, obstruct blood flow, and damage vascular walls. Barkaway et al. provide a review that beautifully illustrates concepts and directions at this intersection between neuroimmunology and cerebrovascular research.35 Faulhaber et al. introduce easy-to-use reagents that label circulating immune cells for in vivo imaging that may facilitate new discoveries in this area.36 Further, Fukada et al. provide an innovative photothrombotic approach to occlude single brain vessels at depth that could be applied to precision studies of immune cell-vascular responses to brain injury.37

In summary, cerebrovascular research is clearly alive and well. There is no shortage of questions, powerful techniques, or innovative young researchers in our quest to uncover mechanisms of cerebrovascular function in health and disease. We are honored to have served as guest editors for this exciting collection of papers.

References

1. 

H. Girouard and C. Iadecola, “Neurovascular coupling in the normal brain and in hypertension, stroke, and Alzheimer disease,” J. Appl. Physiol., 100 328 –335 https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00966.2005 (2006). Google Scholar

2. 

B. V. Zlokovic, “The blood-brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders,” Neuron, 57 178 –201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.003 NERNET 0896-6273 (2008). Google Scholar

3. 

J. J. Iliff et al., “A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β,” Sci. Transl. Med., 4 147ra111 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 STMCBQ 1946-6234 (2012). Google Scholar

4. 

E. N. Bakker et al., “Lymphatic clearance of the brain: perivascular, paravascular and significance for neurodegenerative diseases,” Cell. Mol. Neurobiol., 36 181 –194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-015-0273-8 CMNEDI 0272-4340 (2016). Google Scholar

5. 

L. Marchetti and B. Engelhardt, “Immune cell trafficking across the blood-brain barrier in the absence and presence of neuroinflammation,” Vasc. Biol., 2 H1 –H18 https://doi.org/10.1530/VB-19-0033 (2020). Google Scholar

6. 

K. Shaw et al., “Neurovascular coupling and oxygenation are decreased in hippocampus compared to neocortex because of microvascular differences,” Nat. Commun., 12 3190 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23508-y NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2021). Google Scholar

7. 

S. J. Pfau et al., “Vascular and perivascular cell profiling reveals the molecular and cellular bases of blood-brain barrier heterogeneity,” (2021). Google Scholar

8. 

H. C. Bennett and Y. Kim, “Advances in studying whole mouse brain vasculature using high-resolution 3D light microscopy imaging,” Neurophotonics, 9 021902 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021902 (2022). Google Scholar

9. 

M. Freitas-Andrade et al., “Unbiased analysis of mouse brain endothelial networks from two- or three-dimensional fluorescence images,” Neurophotonics, 9 031916 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031916 (2022). Google Scholar

10. 

W. Meier-Ruge et al., “Age-related white matter atrophy in the human brain,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 673 260 –269 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb27462.x ANYAA9 0077-8923 (1992). Google Scholar

11. 

Y. D. Reijmer et al., “Improved sensitivity to cerebral white matter abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease with spherical deconvolution based tractography,” PLoS One, 7 e44074 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044074 POLNCL 1932-6203 (2012). Google Scholar

12. 

N. G. Horton et al., “In vivo three-photon microscopy of subcortical structures within an intact mouse brain,” Nat. Photonics, 7 205 –209 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.336 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2013). Google Scholar

13. 

D. G. Ouzounov et al., “In vivo three-photon imaging of activity of GCaMP6-labeled neurons deep in intact mouse brain,” Nat. Methods, 14 388 –390 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4183 1548-7091 (2017). Google Scholar

14. 

M. A. Thornton et al., “Characterization of red fluorescent reporters for dual-color in vivo three-photon microscopy,” Neurophotonics, 9 031912 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031912 (2022). Google Scholar

15. 

Y. Li and J. Tang, “Blood vessel tail artifacts suppression in optical coherence tomography angiography,” Neurophotonics, 9 021906 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021906 (2022). Google Scholar

16. 

M. Tournissac et al., “Cranial window for longitudinal and multimodal imaging of the whole mouse cortex,” Neurophotonics, 9 031921 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031921 (2022). Google Scholar

17. 

D. R. Miller et al., “Continuous blood flow visualization with laser speckle contrast imaging during neurovascular surgery,” Neurophotonics, 9 021908 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021908 (2022). Google Scholar

18. 

D. Attwell et al., “Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow,” Nature, 468 232 –243 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09613 (2010). Google Scholar

19. 

C. H. T. Tran, “Toolbox for studying neurovascular coupling in vivo, with a focus on vascular activity and calcium dynamics in astrocytes,” Neurophotonics, 9 021909 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021909 (2022). Google Scholar

20. 

K. A. Gorzo and G. R. Gordon, “Photonics tools begin to clarify astrocyte calcium transients,” Neurophotonics, 9 021907 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021907 (2022). Google Scholar

21. 

T. A. Longden et al., “Capillary K+-sensing initiates retrograde hyperpolarization to increase local cerebral blood flow,” Nat. Neurosci., 20 717 –726 https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4533 NANEFN 1097-6256 (2017). Google Scholar

22. 

D. A. Jeffrey, J. T. Fontaine and F. Dabertrand, “Ex vivo capillary-parenchymal arteriole approach to study brain pericyte physiology,” Neurophotonics, 9 031919 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031919 (2022). Google Scholar

23. 

D. Bojovic, T. L. Stackhouse and A. Mishra, “Assaying activity-dependent arteriole and capillary responses in brain slices,” Neurophotonics, 9 031913 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031913 (2022). Google Scholar

24. 

H. Har-Gil et al., “Versatile software and hardware combo enabling photon counting acquisition and real-time display for multiplexing, 2D and continuous 3D two-photon imaging applications,” Neurophotonics, 9 031920 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031920 (2022). Google Scholar

25. 

D. A. Hartmann et al., “Brain capillary pericytes exert a substantial but slow influence on blood flow,” Nat. Neurosci., 24 633 –645 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00793-2 NANEFN 1097-6256 (2021). Google Scholar

26. 

Ş.E. Erdener, G. Küreli and T. Dalkara, “Contractile apparatus in CNS capillary pericytes,” Neurophotonics, 9 021904 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021904 (2022). Google Scholar

27. 

C. E. Dorrier et al., “Emerging roles for CNS fibroblasts in health, injury and disease,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 23 23 –34 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00525-w NRNAAN 1471-003X (). Google Scholar

28. 

S. K. Bonney et al., “Distinct features of brain perivascular fibroblasts and mural cells revealed by in vivo two-photon imaging,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 42 (6), 966 –978 https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X211068528 (2021). Google Scholar

29. 

H. E. Jones, K. A. Abrams and J. A. Siegenthaler, “Techniques for visualizing fibroblast-vessel interactions in the developing and adult CNS,” Neurophotonics, 9 021911 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021911 (2022). Google Scholar

30. 

C. Bağcı et al., “Overview of extracellular vesicle characterization techniques and introduction to combined reflectance and fluorescence confocal microscopy to distinguish extracellular vesicle subpopulations,” Neurophotonics, 9 021903 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021903 (2022). Google Scholar

31. 

Q. Zhang et al., “Behavioral and physiological monitoring for awake neurovascular coupling experiments: a how-to guide,” Neurophotonics, 9 021905 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021905 (2022). Google Scholar

32. 

V. Coelho-Santos and A. Y. Shih, “Postnatal development of cerebrovascular structure and the neurogliovascular unit,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Dev. Biol., 9 e363 https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.363 (2020). Google Scholar

33. 

V. Coelho-Santos, T. Tieu and A. Y. Shih, “Reinforced thinned-skull window for repeated imaging of the neonatal mouse brain,” Neurophotonics, 9 031918 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031918 (2022). Google Scholar

34. 

S. A. Keil et al., “Dynamic infrared imaging of cerebrospinal fluid tracer influx into the brain,” Neurophotonics, 9 031915 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031915 (2022). Google Scholar

35. 

A. Barkaway, D. Attwell and N. Korte, “Immune-vascular mural cell interactions: consequences for immune cell trafficking, cerebral blood flow, and the blood-brain barrier,” Neurophotonics, 9 031914 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031914 (2022). Google Scholar

36. 

L. D. Faulhaber et al., “Antibody-based in vivo leukocyte label for two-photon brain imaging in mice,” Neurophotonics, 9 031917 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031917 (2022). Google Scholar

37. 

M. Fukuda et al., “Depth-targeted intracortical microstroke by two-photon photothrombosis in rodent brain,” Neurophotonics, 9 021910 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021910 (2022). Google Scholar

Biography

Andy Y. Shih is an Associate Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics and Bioengineering at the University of Washington and Principal Investigator in the Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine at the Seattle Children’s Research Institute. He obtained his PhD from the University of British Columbia and conducted postdoctoral studies at the University of California, San Diego. His laboratory ( www.theshihlab.com) uses advanced imaging approaches to study cerebrovascular structure and function across the lifespan and in relation to disease conditions (Twitter: @AndyShih_Lab).

Vanessa Coelho-Santos has been a postdoctoral fellow at Seattle Children’s Research Institute/University of Washington, since 2018. In the same year, she received her PhD from the University of Coimbra, Portugal. Her research interests include the study of brain vasculature and neurovascular units in health and in the context of disease. At present, she uses in vivo multiphoton imaging on mouse models to better comprehend brain vascular changes and their association with neurodevelopmental outcome (Twitter: vcoelhosantos).

Kıvılcım Kılıç is a senior research scientist at Boston University Biomedical Engineering Department and Neurophotonics Center. She graduated from Hacettepe University Medical School in 2008 and immediately began two years of obligatory medical service, overseeing an emergency department in Merzifon, Turkey. She finished her doctoral training at Hacettepe University Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry Institute in 2013. She held two postdoctoral researcher positions at UCSD and UCLA and a research scientist position at Boston university prior to her current appointment. Her major research interests are neurovascular imaging and electrophysiology.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Andy Y. Shih, Vanessa Coelho-Santos, and Kivilcim Kiliç "Special Section Guest Editorial: Imaging Neuroimmune, Neuroglial, and Neurovascular Interfaces," Neurophotonics 9(3), 031901 (30 September 2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.3.031901
Published: 30 September 2022
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Brain

Neuroimaging

In vivo imaging

Tissues

Capillaries

Neurons

Blood vessels

Back to Top