Improving STI etch process development by replacing XSEM metrology with scatterometry

Matthew Sendelbach; Andres Munoz; Pedro Herrera

doi:10.1117/12.600880

10 May 2005 Improving STI etch process development by replacing XSEM metrology with scatterometry

Matthew Sendelbach, Andres Munoz, Pedro Herrera

Proceedings Volume 5752, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600880
Event: Microlithography 2005, 2005, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

For years, scatterometers have been providing full profile information on line/space arrays. These profiles are often compared to XSEM images in order to show how well they match. This is done by placing the profiles and images next to each other or by overlapping them. The comparisons, however, are typically qualitative; this makes it difficult to determine exactly how good the match is. Furthermore, this qualitative comparison makes it difficult to determine whether profiles from one scatterometry tool or model match corresponding XSEM images better than another tool's or model's profiles. This study circumvents this problem by making multiple measurements of critical dimension, sidewall angle, and height/depth from XSEM images, and then comparing them to scatterometry measurements previously collected from the same locations. The vehicle that is used for this study is a series of etched STI wafers that were subjected to a range of etch processes. Total Measurement Uncertainty (TMU) analysis is used to properly quantify the comparisons. Both scatterometry library and regression models are investigated; the results from both of these methods are compared to the XSEM measurements and to each other. A technique to estimate the accuracy of the XSEM measurements themselves is also used. Results show that, within statistical error, both scatterometry methods provide the same information about the samples. Furthermore, the data reveal that the scatterometer is in most cases about as accurate as the XSEM metrology in quantifying significant structural components of the samples. Finally, examples showing how the increased sampling of scatterometry can be used to improve etch process development is provided.

Citation Download Citation

Matthew Sendelbach, Andres Munoz, and Pedro Herrera "Improving STI etch process development by replacing XSEM metrology with scatterometry", Proc. SPIE 5752, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX, (10 May 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.600880

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available