|
|
1.INTRODUCTIONSurface plasmon polaritons (SPP) are widely used in environmental sensing in the visible frequency range [1]. They are surface electromagnetic wave (SEW) solutions of the macroscopic Maxwell equations which arise at sharp interfaces between good metals and dielectrics [2]. Very recently it was demonstrated that a different kind of SEW may exist at a gradual interface between two different lossy electromagnetic media [3]. If a gradual transition region ε(z) is assumed to exist (as illustrated in Fig. 1) at the boundary separating two media, the wave equation for the TM polarized SEW mode may be written as which coincides with a one-dimensional Schrödinger equation in which the wave function is introduced as ψ=ε1/2Εz, and Ez is the electric field component of the surface wave, which is perpendicular to the interface. The effective potential energy V(z) in Eq.(1) depends on the gradient terms, and the effective total energy -k2 is defined by the SEW wave vector k along the interface. As demonstrated in [3], the gradient terms may become dominant in Eq.(1), leading to appearance of unconventional propagating surface wave solutions even in the case of a gradual interface between two strongly lossy materials in which ε(z) is large and imaginary. In particular, such novel SEW solutions were predicted and experimentally observed at interfaces between water and air [4], and water and sea floor [5]. It should be noted that such novel SEW solutions differ substantially from Zenneck waves, which are known to appear even in the sharp interface approximation [6]. The generic feature of Zenneck waves is their radiative character, which is due to their wave vector k being smaller than the wave vector of photons in the adjacent dielectric medium. Unlike Zenneck waves, the wave vector k of the novel SEW solutions is typically larger than the photon wave vector (see Fig. 1b), which makes them similar to SPPs in this respect. 2.SENSING APPLICATIONS OF SURFACE ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AT WATER-AIR AND WATER-ICE INTERFACESThe similarity between SPPs and the surface electromagnetic waves at various water interfaces make them a very good candidate for water and ice monitoring applications. Indeed, sensing applications of SEWs are based on strong exponential field enhancement at the interface, which in the case of SPPs leads to their sensitivity to even submonolayers of various surface adsorbates [1]. Therefore, a similar enhanced sensitivity to surface contaminations may be predicted for SEW-based water and ice sensors. The theoretically predicted exponential enhancement of SEW field near the water-air interface was indeed observed in our experiments conducted in the RF domain, as illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. As illustrated in Fig. 2, excitation and propagation of SEW RF signals has been extensively tested in the well-controlled swimming pool environment. The received SEW signal was studied as a function of depth and distance underwater. The typical received signal intensity as a function of z measured across the air-water interface is shown in Fig.3. The same antenna was used below and above the interface. As expected, the measured field profile matched the theoretical SEW field distribution, which falls off exponentially away from the water-air interface into both media [3]. Note that this experiment also proves that the SEW transmission system is quite efficient at communicating through the water-air interface, which is known to be extremely difficult for acoustical and optical wireless communication systems. Using the same experimental system, we were also able to study SEW scattering by underwater objects. The scattering effect appears to be rather strong near surface and, unlike the acoustic detection systems, the SEW scattering strongly depends on the dielectric properties of an underwater object. As illustrated in Fig.4, placing a metal cylinder underwater in the path of SEW propagation led to attenuation of the received signal. On the other hand, placing a similar shape dielectric cylinder underwater led to the increase of SEW signal. The opposite SEW scattering effects depending on the dielectric properties of an object located underwater is clearly seen from the comparison of Figs 4b and 4d. The obtained experimental results are consistent with our theoretical study of SEW scattering by underwater objects, which is presented in Fig. 5. To illustrate the practicality of SEW imaging, even in such conditions as imaging under ice, we have performed the numerical simulations at considerably lower SEW frequency of 10 KHz, so that underwater detection at tens of meters scale would be feasible. The schematic geometry of our study performed using COMSOL Multiphysics electromagnetic solver is shown in Fig. 5a together with the map of total SEW field distribution. It roughly corresponds to the geometry of our experiments shown in Fig. 4e with an addition of surface ice layer. These theoretical results indeed demonstrate a very similar dielectric contrast in SEW scattering. While metal objects obstruct SEW penetration, dielectric objects placed underwater facilitate SEW signal propagation, which leads to increased SEW signal. Our theoretical results on SEW scattering by under-ice objects indicate that this novel technique may potentially be used to study Antarctic ice melting, which remains a great global challenge for the humanity [7]. The SEW field at the seawater-ice interface must be extremely sensitive to the ice surface roughness, which typically indicates the onset of ice melting. 3.NOVEL SURFACE ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE GEOMETRIES FOR VISIBLE AND UV LIGHT APPLICATIONSWe should also understand based on Eq.(1) that similar SEW modes must also exist at gradual interfaces between either two dielectrics or two metals, which may or may not be highly lossy. Indeed, in such cases the shape of the effective potential from Fig. 1b, which is mostly affected by the gradient terms, will look essentially similar. The only necessary condition for such modes to exist is that the loss tangent should not change considerably across the interface [8]. Therefore, TM polarized SEW solutions must also exist in the highly lossy dielectric cases in the UV range, which is quite typical for almost all known optical materials. Such SEW solutions will have a k vector larger than the k vector of photons in each neighboring medium, thus making them very similar to SPPs. The existence of such large k vector SEW modes in a large variety of dielectric samples may lead to interesting new possibilities in UV nanophotonics and environmental sensing. Unlike the typical plasmonic metals, which are not well suited for nanofabrication using the CMOS techniques, numerous silicon-based SEW geometries become possible. Indeed, around 300 nm wavelength of UV light, doping of silicon with various metals, such as nickel or titanium, changes the absolute magnitude of the dielectric constant of silicon, while it remains almost pure imaginary [9]. We have obtained strong evidence in favor of existence of such novel SEW modes in the UV-VIS domain on the example of silicon-titanium interface – see Fig.6. In this experiment we have studied UV transmission of an overlap region between a 260 nm thick silicon and a 230 nm thick titanium film. A stripe of enhanced transmission which goes in parallel with the silicon-titanium interface is clearly visible in Fig.6. According to the Fermi’s golden rule, the increased transmission of light at the silicon-titanium junction indicates an increased density of photonic states (DOS) in the general area of the junction, which become available to the photons tunneling through this thick composite conductive film. Therefore, a strong increase in light transmission near the Si/Ti junction is a rather strong indication in favor of the SEW interfacial modes. 4.CONCLUSIONSIn conclusion, we have demonstrated that gradual interfaces between lossy conductive media support propagation of novel surface electromagnetic waves in the RF, visible and UV domains. These novel SEW solutions are different from the more well-known surface plasmon polaritons. On the other hand, because these novel surface waves share many important similarities with the conventional surface plasmons, such as strong exponential field enhancement at the interface, potential applications of the novel surface waves to monitor water surface and the seawater-ice interface, as well as other environmental sensing applications in the RF and UV-VIS domains look very promising. REFERENCESMasson, J.-F.,
“Portable and field-deployed surface plasmon resonance and plasmonic sensors,”
Analyst, 145 3776
–3800
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN00316F Google Scholar
Zayats, A. V., Smolyaninov, I. I., Maradudin, A.,
“Nano-optics of surface plasmon-polaritons,”
Physics Reports, 408 131
–314
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.11.001 Google Scholar
Smolyaninov, I. I.,
“Surface electromagnetic waves in lossy conductive media: tutorial,”
JOSA B, 39 1894
–1901
(2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.463692 Google Scholar
Smolyaninov, I. I., Balzano, Q., Davis, C. C., Young, D.,
“Surface wave-based underwater radio communication,”
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 17 2503
–2507
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2018.2880008 Google Scholar
Smolyaninov, I. I., Balzano, Q., Kozyrev, A. B.,
“Surface electromagnetic waves at seawater-air and seawater-seafloor interfaces,”
IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 4 51
–59
(2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/OJAP.2022.3231885 Google Scholar
Michalski, K. A., Mosig, J. R.,
“The Sommerfeld half-space problem revisited: From radio frequencies and Zenneck waves to visible light and Fano modes,”
J. Electromagn. Waves Appl, 30 1
–42
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2015.1093964 Google Scholar
Silvano, A., Rintoul, S. R., Peña-Molino, B., Hobbs, W. R., van Wijk, E., Aoki S., Tamura, T., Williams, G. D.,
“Freshening by glacial meltwater enhances melting of ice shelves and reduces formation of Antarctic Bottom Water,”
Science Advances, 4 eaap9467
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9467 Google Scholar
Smolyaninov, I. I.,
“Gradient-index nanophotonics,”
Journal of Optics, 23 095002
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ac1322 Google Scholar
Amiotti, M., Borghesi, A., Guizzetti, G., Nava, F.,
“Optical properties of polycrystalline nickel silicides,”
Phys. Rev. B, 42 8939
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.8939 Google Scholar
|