When an optically rough surface is illuminated by the coherent light, we can only capture speckle pattern due to random constructive and destructive interference between light waves scattered from elementary areas of the rough surface. Here we compare two different correlography-based speckle imaging models, the results demonstrate that there is no obvious difference in imaging capabilities between two models. The spatial light propagation processes are both assumed to be far-filed Fraunhofer diffraction in two models. In order to verify the far-field distance, we capture speckle patterns in different imaging distance (range from 5cm to 100cm). We found that the far-field diffraction is always applicable in our experiments if the speckle size satisfies the Nyquist criterion, and we analyzed the relationship between speckle contrast and imaging distance, the curve of the relationship between reconstructed image size and imaging distance is fitted, the physical interpretation of the function parameters is given.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.